But she is right about us not seeing things in front of our eyes if we're not looking for them. Right after the Velvet Revolution in 1989 (the collapse of the Czechoslovak communism), many new spiritual and other directions were trying to find their ways to the new free countries. He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. 6. [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. We're always being told we don't use our brain to its full capacity. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. It's there. You can begin to be skeptical that the speaker is somehow trying to use quantum mechanics to argue fundamentally that you can change the world by thinking about it. 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013. There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. Some ideas discussed in the film are: In the narrative segments of the film, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. He claims the drop was achieved. Miceal Ledwith suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific. But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. 1. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." It's there. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. John Haglin The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. That's not the case. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? Filmed in Portland, Oregon, What the Bleep Do We Know!? Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? "What the bleep. Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. Answer (1 of 6): Although not being as well educated in the area as Professor Wacker, I think it's overly simplistic to suggest the subjects raised in the movie to be either factual or "almost completely mumbo-jumbo". How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? [1], The films co-director, Mark Vicente, would go on to co-found The Knife Media, a pro-Trump digital news outlet linked to NXIVM. Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . This message will appear once per week Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. [an error occurred while processing this directive]. There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychiatrist, PhD candidate in physics), in What the Bleep Do We Know? Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. Blech. Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." I'm always up for a good New Age flick, even one masquerading as a documentary. I am glad that someone else thought that that movie was a bunch of garbage. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. As a series of scientists and scientist types take a wayward stab at explaining quantum theory -- it seems to involve being in two places at once -- "What the Bleep," which opens nationwide today . I guess the difference between me and those other people is that I actually have some grasp on the concepts that the movie was trying to talk about. "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). Featuring two (!) Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. IE 11 is not supported. Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." logged you out. These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. Andrew B Newberg, (MD, Radiologist), in What the Bleep Do We Know? And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. What the Bleep Do We Know!? Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. Now I don't have an automatic prejudice against 35,000-year-old warriors from Atlantis or the women who channel them. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. - Dr. John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. What the Bleep!? That movie started its life as a small documentary about Spirit and Science, but grew in scope (and budget) and became What the BLEEP Do We Know!? It's certainly not. !" is a radical departure from convention. Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. Whether or not you buy into its "you are God in the making" philosophy, "What the Bleep Do We Know?" The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. Quantum mechanics is crazy, but it's just crazy enough to make the world still be sensible at a macroscopic level, the level that we experience. To date, Dr Emoto has not taken up the challenge. Science Monitor has expired. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." Amit Goswami (PhD) in What the Bleep Do We Know?. DO WE KNOW? "We only see what we believe is possible Native American Indians on Caribbean Islands couldn't see Columbus's ships [sitting on the horizon] because they were beyond their knowledge" Dr. Candace Pert (former scientist, current new-age guru) in What the Bleep Do We Know? We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. Your subscription to 3. People latch onto their dreams, and they always try to match them to reality. List of films featuring the deaf and hard of hearing, "How the NXIVM Sex Cult Defended Trump from Media Attacks", "Cinefex article detailing the visual effects for the film", "New Age: What the Bleep? At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. That's one of the very strange properties of quantum mechanics. Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot. William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. But we're certainly using them at the Large Hadron Collider, which we couldn't even operate if we didn't have superconducting magnets. That's what makes the world so interesting. [8], In the Publishers Weekly article, publicist Linda Rienecker of New Page Books says that she sees the success as part of a wider phenomenon, stating "A large part of the population is seeking spiritual connections, and they have the whole world to choose from now". Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. The debate here is that we'll be able to use quantum mechanics to break codes, in particular to determine the big prime numbers that are at the basis of the security of your credit cards and your bank cards. [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? The director, William Arntz, has described What the Bleep as a film for the "metaphysical left". There's nothing wrong with that. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:I'm citing \"Fair Use\" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdfAlso \"Fair Dealing\" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4ahttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4Censorship is NOT a valid argument.This is the first part of my critical analysis of \"What The Bleep Do We Know?! In the last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Krauss says "no area of physics stimulates more nonsense in the public arena than quantum mechanics." 5.Miceal Ledwith a clergyman with a rather dubious past (see http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565) is the one chosen by the film makers to be the theological spokesman. HCI president Peter Vegso stated that in regard to this book, "What the Bleep is the quantum leap in the New Age world," and "by marrying science and spirituality, it is the foundation of future thought."[5]. While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. One of the scientists interviewed is John Hagelin who, besides being part of the TM cult surrounding Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, presidential candidate of the Natural Law Party, and Minister of Science and Technology of the Global Country of World Peace is a rather prominent particle theorist. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . Film / What the #$*! A roommate of mine was interested in TM and I think it was he who introduced us. [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. subscription yet. His 73 papers are mostly about supersymmetric GUTs and considered quite respectable, with a total of over 5000 citations, including 641 citations for one of them alone. Consciousness must be involved. Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. But it's not true for the universe at large. Many people are dubious that Penrose's suggestions are reasonable, because the brain is not an isolated quantum-mechanical system. There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way. The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . It was amusing when John Hagelin tried to run for US president representing the Natural Law party during the 1990s. Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far: ReportWire.org info@planettvstudios.com nicholas@planettvstudios.com Eric@planettvstudios.com Julie@planettvstudios.com Website YouTube Channel Facebook Twitter Instagram Planet TV Studios LHTV LLC The host of the show said this was done because it was negative So does classical physics. They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream. Not exactly, Amit. The narrative follows a fictional photographer, Amanda, through her emotional and existential journey of life. That's not always true, but it's often true. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. 4. is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness. And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. . 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. You should be wary whenever you hear something like, "Quantum mechanics connects you with the universe" or "quantum mechanics unifies you with everything else." - - While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. It'd be like being the CEO of a massive company and having to listen to what every single employee was doing every minute of every day. Where were we now? That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. First, such claims rely on "hidden variables" susceptible to influence, he says. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. The observer can't be ignored." Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. presents a viewpoint of the physical universe and human life within it, with connections to neuroscience and quantum physics. "The protagonist, Amanda, played by Academy Award-Winning actress Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. subscription. It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. Beliefnet is a lifestyle website providing feature editorial content around the topics of inspiration, spirituality, health, wellness, love and family, news and entertainment. You are free to comment as you wish. Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Dr Candice Pert Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. what the bleep do we know watch online free, what the bleep do we know trailer, what the bleep do we know movie, what the bleep do we know debunked, what the bleep do . Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. By 1984 he had moved to Maharishi University and started building up the physics department there. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. (It's all to do with photons of light from your measuring instrument hitting the poor electron and knocking it for six). [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie, Robert Bailey Jr.. A fictional photographer's quest to spiritually rediscover herself is interspersed with documentary footage of scientists and theologians discussing the philosophical aspects of quantum physics. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. Neither of them convincingly achieve this. During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money.